---

Quick Definition

Major incident management (MIM) is the structured practice of detecting, coordinating, resolving, and learning from incidents that cause severe disruption to critical services or large groups of users.
Analogy: MIM is like an air-traffic control center during a storm — triage, coordinated commands, and strict procedures to keep the most critical flights safe.
Formal technical line: MIM is the incident lifecycle and orchestration layer that enforces escalation, communication, containment, and post-incident remediation for high-severity outages across production systems.

---

What is Major incident management (MIM)?

What it is / what it is NOT

• It is a cross-functional operational discipline for responding to high-severity outages affecting critical business outcomes.
• It is NOT routine incident handling for single-service failures or simple pager alerts.
• It is NOT a replacement for proactive reliability engineering; it complements SRE, DevOps, and platform teams.

Key properties and constraints

• Time sensitivity: prioritizes speed and safe stabilization.
• Cross-team coordination: involves engineering, product, customer, legal, and sometimes executive stakeholders.
• Pre-defined roles: incident commander, communications lead, tech leads, Scribe, and war-room participants.
• Clear thresholds: severity definitions tied to business impact are mandatory.
• Auditability and traceability: actions, decisions, and timelines must be recorded.
• Security-conscious: MIM workflows must protect customer data and secrets.
• Automation friendly: AI-assisted triage and runbook automation reduce toil, but human judgment remains central.

Where it fits in modern cloud/SRE workflows

• SRE defines SLIs/SLOs and error budgets that inform when MIM triggers.
• Observability and telemetry feed detection and diagnostics.
• CI/CD and infrastructure as code enable automated rollback and mitigation.
• ChatOps and collaboration tools host the operational flow; automation bots execute scripted mitigations.
• Postmortems and corrective engineering close the loop.

A text-only “diagram description” readers can visualize

• Detection layer: telemetry, alerts, user reports -> Detector.
• Triage layer: on-call or automated triage -> Severity classification.
• Activation: declare major incident -> Incident bridge and roles assigned.
• Containment: rapid mitigations, circuit breakers, traffic shifts.
• Resolution: fix deployment, config change, rollback, or mitigation.
• Communication: internal updates, external status page, stakeholders.
• Post-incident: timeline, RCA, action items, verification.

Major incident management (MIM) in one sentence

MIM is the end-to-end coordination and execution system that enables teams to rapidly stabilize critical outages, communicate effectively, and drive durable remediation.

Major incident management (MIM) vs related terms (TABLE REQUIRED)

ID	Term	How it differs from Major incident management (MIM)	Common confusion
T1	Incident Response	Focuses on any incident; MIM is for high-severity incidents only.	Confusing scope vs severity
T2	Postmortem	Postmortem is retrospective; MIM is active response.	Thinking they’re interchangeable
T3	On-call	On-call is staffing; MIM is process and orchestration.	Assuming on-call equals MIM
T4	Disaster Recovery	DR focuses on catastrophic infrastructure failure; MIM covers service-impacting outages too.	Overlap on scope
T5	Problem Management	Problem mgmt addresses root causes long-term; MIM focuses on immediate stabilization.	Mixing immediate vs long-term work
T6	Runbook	Runbooks are prescriptive tasks; MIM includes dynamic coordination beyond runbooks.	Expecting runbooks to cover all cases
T7	Business Continuity	BCP is organization-level continuity planning; MIM is technical incident execution.	Confusing business vs technical scopes
T8	Crisis Communications	Crisis comms is stakeholder messaging; MIM includes technical remediation as well.	Thinking comms handles tech fixes

Row Details (only if any cell says “See details below”)

• None

---

Why does Major incident management (MIM) matter?

Business impact (revenue, trust, risk)

• Revenue loss: Major outages directly stop transactions and conversions.
• Reputation hit: Downtime affecting many customers erodes trust.
• Compliance and legal risk: Data breaches or SLA failures can trigger penalties.
• Customer churn and support cost surge: Long incidents increase support tickets and refunds.

Engineering impact (incident reduction, velocity)

• Rapid stabilization reduces scope creep and mitigates collateral failures.
• Mature MIM enables safer, faster development by reducing fear of catastrophic release.
• Structured post-incident remediation reduces recurrence and frees engineering capacity.

SRE framing (SLIs/SLOs/error budgets/toil/on-call)

• SLIs detect severity thresholds that can trigger MIM escalation when SLO breaches risk business impact.
• Error budgets guide when to prioritize reliability work vs feature velocity.
• Proper automation reduces toil in MIM: scripted mitigation, playbook bots, and runbook automation.
• On-call rotation and clear escalation rules prevent burnout and ensure coverage.

3–5 realistic “what breaks in production” examples

• Global API gateway misconfiguration causing 50% of requests to fail.
• Database primary crash during high traffic window leading to elevated latency and timeouts.
• Cluster autoscaler bug that scales down critical pods causing service outage.
• Third-party auth provider outage causing complete login failure.
• Configuration deployment that accidentally disables a feature flag causing data corruption.

---

Where is Major incident management (MIM) used? (TABLE REQUIRED)

ID	Layer/Area	How Major incident management (MIM) appears	Typical telemetry	Common tools
L1	Edge and CDN	Traffic loss or routing errors need rapid failover	HTTP errors, latency, edge hit ratio	See details below: L1
L2	Network and Load Balancing	Packet loss or BGP flaps need network mitigation	Packet drops, SNMP, flow logs	See details below: L2
L3	Service and Application	App errors or cascading failures require rollback	Error rates, latency, traces	APM, tracing, logs
L4	Data and Storage	DB unavailability or corruption requires failover	Query errors, replication lag	DB monitoring, backups
L5	Platform and Orchestration	Cluster issues need evacuation and rescheduling	Pod restarts, node failures	Kubernetes tools, infra monitoring
L6	Serverless and PaaS	Provider or function errors need traffic reroute	Invocation errors, cold-start latencies	Cloud monitoring, function logs
L7	CI/CD and Deployments	Bad deployments need immediate rollback	Deployment failures, abnormal metrics	CI systems, deployment logs
L8	Security Incidents	Breaches need containment and forensics	IDS alerts, audit logs	SIEM, EDR

Row Details (only if needed)

• L1: Edge failover steps include DNS TTL, CDN origin failover, and rate limiting.
• L2: Network mitigation could be traffic engineering, provider failover, or ACL changes.
• L3: Service steps include circuit breaking, traffic shadowing, and rapid rollback.
• L4: DB mitigations include promoting replica, restoring backup, or read-only mode.
• L5: Platform includes cordoning nodes, scaling control planes, and node replacement.
• L6: Serverless mitigations include provider status check, circuit breaker at gateway, and fallback service.
• L7: CI/CD mitigation includes aborting pipelines, rolling back releases, and isolating canaries.
• L8: Security incidents require forensics, evidence preservation, and legal notification.

---

When should you use Major incident management (MIM)?

When it’s necessary

• Major business-facing outages affecting revenue or core functionality.
• Outages impacting many customers or critical SLAs.
• Security incidents with active exploitation or data exfiltration.
• When escalation is needed beyond a single on-call owner.

When it’s optional

• Partial degradation affecting limited users where mitigation is local and quick.
• Non-critical back-office systems where failover can be scheduled.
• Investigations requiring deeper root cause analysis but no immediate business impact.

When NOT to use / overuse it

• For low-severity, routine incidents that block single customers.
• For planned maintenance or rollout issues with no service outage.
• Overusing MIM for all alerts causes fatigue and erodes the seriousness of declarations.

Decision checklist

• If user-facing transactions dropped by X% and error rate above Y for Z minutes -> declare MIM.
• If incident spans >2 teams and no single owner can remediate fast -> declare MIM.
• If incident can be mitigated by automated rollback in <5 minutes -> optional; evaluate escalation.

Maturity ladder: Beginner -> Intermediate -> Advanced

• Beginner: Basic severity definitions, Slack bridge, manual runbooks.
• Intermediate: Automated alerts, dedicated incident commander role, integrated status page.
• Advanced: Automated triage with ML, runbook automation, postmortem-driven remediation, and continuous reliability engineering.

---

How does Major incident management (MIM) work?

Components and workflow

1. Detection: telemetry, health checks, and user reports.
2. Triage: confirm impact, scope, and initial severity.
3. Activation: declare major incident, open bridge, assign roles.
4. Containment: limit blast radius via failover, throttling, or circuit breakers.
5. Remediation: deploy fix, rollback, or patch configuration.
6. Recovery: validate system health and monitor.
7. Communication: status updates to stakeholders and customers.
8. Postmortem: timeline, root cause analysis, action items.

Data flow and lifecycle

• Telemetry -> Alerting engine -> On-call or automation -> Incident bridge -> Actions logged to timeline -> Mitigation executed -> Metrics move to stable state -> Postmortem stored in knowledge base.

Edge cases and failure modes

• Telemetry failures that hide the incident.
• Communication channels failing during coordination.
• Partial automation that escalates errors rather than fixing them.
• Multiple simultaneous incidents causing resource contention.

Typical architecture patterns for Major incident management (MIM)

1. Centralized Incident Command Pattern – Single incident commander, cross-functional bridge, unified timeline. – Use when companies need strict central coordination.
2. Federated Team Lead Pattern – Team leads own domain-specific mitigation; commander coordinates. – Use in large orgs with autonomous teams.
3. Automated Triage and Mitigation Pattern – ML or rules-based triage with automated safe mitigations. – Use when telemetry fidelity and automation coverage are high.
4. Traffic-Oriented Failover Pattern – Use load balancers, feature flags, and CDN rules to quickly route around faults. – Use when multiple regions or replicas exist.
5. Read-Only Fallback Pattern – Switch to read-only mode to preserve data integrity while restoring services. – Use during suspected data corruption incidents.

Failure modes & mitigation (TABLE REQUIRED)

ID	Failure mode	Symptom	Likely cause	Mitigation	Observability signal
F1	Missing telemetry	No alerts, blind spots	Agent outage or ingestion failure	Use fallback health checks	See details below: F1
F2	Comm channel down	No bridge updates	Slack outage or ACL change	Use secondary comms and phone trees	Secondary channel alerts
F3	Automation executes wrong fix	Worsening state after runbook	Incorrect automation logic	Pause automation, manual control	Spike in error rate post-run
F4	Role confusion	Duplicate work or missing actions	Poor role assignment	Clear IC and role playbooks	Timeline gaps or overlaps
F5	Alert storm	Flood of noisy alerts	Bad thresholds or cascading failures	Suppress, group, and dedupe alerts	High alert count metric
F6	Third-party outage	External dependency failures	Vendor or SaaS provider downtime	Failover or degrade gracefully	Upstream dependency error metrics

Row Details (only if needed)

• F1: Add heartbeat metrics, synthetic tests, and agent fallbacks; ensure different transport for telemetry.
• F2: Maintain out-of-band comm plan with phone lists and SMS; record escalation tree.
• F3: Implement dry-run, canary automation, and automated rollback for safety.
• F4: Train roles with runbook exercises and maintain runbook owner assignments.
• F5: Implement alert grouping and adaptive thresholds; use dedupe rules in alerting system.
• F6: Maintain cached policies, offline mode, and alternative providers for critical paths.

---

Key Concepts, Keywords & Terminology for Major incident management (MIM)

(Glossary of 40+ terms: Term — 1–2 line definition — why it matters — common pitfall)

1. Major incident — High-severity outage requiring coordinated response — Central concept — Over-declaration dilutes signal.
2. Incident commander — Person who leads the incident response — Ensures single point of decision — Commander burnout.
3. Scribe — Person who documents timeline and actions — Creates audit trail — Poor note quality.
4. Runbook — Step-by-step remediation tasks — Speeds response — Stale runbooks.
5. Playbook — Scenario-based action guide involving multiple roles — Useful for complex incidents — Too generic.
6. Severity level — Classification of incident impact — Drives escalation — Ambiguous definitions.
7. Postmortem — Root cause analysis and learnings — Prevents recurrence — Blamelessness missing.
8. RCA — Root cause analysis — Identifies underlying causes — Focusing on symptoms.
9. SLI — Service Level Indicator — Measures service behavior — Wrong SLI choice.
10. SLO — Service Level Objective — Target for SLI — Unrealistic targets.
11. Error budget — Allowed unreliability — Balances features vs reliability — Misused as a deadline.
12. Pager duty — Tool for on-call routing — Ensures coverage — Poor escalation rules.
13. Bridge — Virtual meeting room for incident coordination — Central coordination point — Unreachable bridge.
14. War room — Physical or virtual place for intense collaboration — High focus — Too many attendees.
15. Mitigation — Action to reduce impact quickly — Buys time — Temporary fixes left permanent.
16. Containment — Limit blast radius — Protect other systems — Overly aggressive containment causing more harm.
17. Runaway process — Process consuming resources — Can cause outages — Missing resource limits.
18. Circuit breaker — Prevents cascading failures by tripping — Protects system — Incorrect thresholds.
19. Canary — Small release to test changes — Limits blast radius — Poor canary design.
20. Rollback — Revert change to previous state — Fast recovery — Data consistency concerns.
21. Feature flag — Toggle for functionality — Enables rapid disable — Flag complexity.
22. Synthetic monitoring — Simulated transactions to detect issues — Early detection — Overfocus on synthetic vs real users.
23. Real user monitoring (RUM) — Captures user-side metrics — Shows customer impact — Privacy considerations.
24. Observability — Ability to understand system state — Key to troubleshooting — Data gaps.
25. Telemetry — Metrics, traces, logs — Fuel for detection — High cardinality cost.
26. Alert fatigue — Ignored alerts from noise — Missed critical events — Poor signal-to-noise.
27. ChatOps — Performing ops via chat automation — Speeds collaboration — Audit trails can be incomplete.
28. Playbook automation — Scripted actions from playbooks — Reduces toil — Risky without safeguards.
29. Post-incident review — Closing the loop with remediation — Increases system resilience — No action follow-through.
30. Blamelessness — Culture for honest postmortems — Encourages learning — Misinterpreted as lack of accountability.
31. Runbook automation — Automating standard tasks — Faster response — Misconfigured automation.
32. Escalation policy — Rules for raising severity and notifying others — Ensures coverage — Too slow or too noisy.
33. Stakeholder comms — Structured updates to business and customers — Maintains trust — Overly technical messages.
34. Incident timeline — Timestamped sequence of events — Essential for RCA — Missing timestamps.
35. Forensics — Evidence collection for security incidents — Legal and repro steps — Destroying evidence accidentally.
36. Incident metrics — MTTR, MTTD, MTTA — Measure operational performance — Misinterpreted metrics.
37. MTTR — Mean time to recovery — Measures average time to restore service — Hiding detection time.
38. MTTD — Mean time to detect — Measures detection speed — Poor telemetry skews results.
39. MTTA — Mean time to acknowledge — Measures on-call responsiveness — Long notification chains.
40. Blameless postmortem — Postmortem without blame — Focus on systems and processes — Turning into blame sessions.
41. Playbook versioning — Tracking runbook changes — Prevents stale docs — Missing version control.
42. Incident simulation — Game days and chaos engineering — Tests readiness — Not accounting for human factors.
43. Pager escalation — Sequential or parallel callouts — Ensures someone responds — Unclear ownership.
44. Burn rate — Rate at which error budget is consumed — Helps throttle releases — Misapplied to unrelated metrics.
45. Service map — Visualization of dependencies — Helps triage — Incomplete or outdated maps.
46. Confidence threshold — Level of assurance before action — Prevents premature changes — Over-cautiousness slows response.
47. Breach window — Timeframe of potential data exposure — Critical in security incidents — Poor timestamping.
48. On-call rotation — Schedule for responders — Maintains coverage — Unbalanced rotations cause burnout.
49. SLI aggregation — How SLIs are combined across services — Impacts trigger decisions — Aggregation hides variance.
50. Incident retrospective — Follow-up meeting to track remediation — Ensures closure — No ownership of actions.

---

How to Measure Major incident management (MIM) (Metrics, SLIs, SLOs) (TABLE REQUIRED)

ID	Metric/SLI	What it tells you	How to measure	Starting target	Gotchas
M1	MTTD	How quickly incidents are detected	Time from event to first alert	< 3 minutes for critical paths	Alert noise skews value
M2	MTTA	How fast incidents are acknowledged	Time from alert to human ack	< 2 minutes on-call	Missed notifications bias metric
M3	MTTR	How long to recover service	Time from incident start to recovery	< 30 minutes for critical services	Definition of recovery varies
M4	Incident frequency	How often majors occur	Count per 90 days	Decreasing trend	Classification inconsistencies
M5	Incident business impact	Revenue or SLA loss per incident	Calculated from transaction loss	Minimize to near zero	Hard to quantify for complex pipelines
M6	Mean time to mitigate	Time to first effective mitigation	Time to containment action	< 10 minutes	Mitigation vs resolution confusion
M7	Postmortem completion rate	Fraction of incidents with postmortems	Completed vs declared	100% for majors	Low quality docs reduce value
M8	Action item closure rate	Remediation actions closed on time	Percent closed within SLA	> 90%	Long-running actions hide risk
M9	Alert-to-incident conversion	Signal quality of alerts	Incidents per alert volume	High conversion rate desired	Overfitting thresholds
M10	Error budget burn rate	Speed of SLO consumption	Rate relative to budget	Automated policy thresholds	Complex aggregates mislead

Row Details (only if needed)

• None

Best tools to measure Major incident management (MIM)

Tool — Observability Platform A

• What it measures for Major incident management (MIM): Metrics, traces, logs correlation and alerting.
• Best-fit environment: Cloud-native microservices and Kubernetes.
• Setup outline:
• Define SLIs and instrument services.
• Configure synthetic checks and alerting rules.
• Build dashboards for on-call and exec views.
• Enable tracing with sampled spans.
• Integrate with incident management and chat.
• Strengths:
• Unified telemetry and correlation.
• Rich visualization.
• Limitations:
• Cost with high-cardinality data.
• Requires instrumentation effort.

Tool — Incident Management Platform B

• What it measures for Major incident management (MIM): Incident lifecycle metrics and role assignments.
• Best-fit environment: Organizations needing structured incident orchestration.
• Setup outline:
• Define severity mappings.
• Configure escalation policies.
• Integrate with monitoring and communication tools.
• Enable incident templates and postmortem workflows.
• Strengths:
• Structured workflows and reporting.
• Postmortem templates and action tracking.
• Limitations:
• Integration overhead.
• Not a telemetry platform.

Tool — Distributed Tracing C

• What it measures for Major incident management (MIM): Request paths and latency hotspots.
• Best-fit environment: Microservices and APIs.
• Setup outline:
• Instrument services with trace IDs.
• Configure sampling and storage.
• Link traces to alerts and tickets.
• Strengths:
• Fast root-cause identification.
• Dependency visibility.
• Limitations:
• Data volume; sampling choices matter.

Tool — Synthetic Monitoring D

• What it measures for Major incident management (MIM): Availability from end-user perspective.
• Best-fit environment: Public-facing APIs and websites.
• Setup outline:
• Create user journey scripts.
• Schedule checks globally.
• Alert on threshold failures.
• Strengths:
• Early detection of user-impacting failures.
• Region-level insights.
• Limitations:
• Synthetic does not replace real-user monitoring.

Tool — ChatOps Automation E

• What it measures for Major incident management (MIM): Action execution times and runbook automation success.
• Best-fit environment: Teams using chat platforms for ops.
• Setup outline:
• Add bots for standard mitigations.
• Audit commands invoked during incidents.
• Connect to CI/CD for rollbacks.
• Strengths:
• Speed and visibility.
• Easier team collaboration.
• Limitations:
• Security posture must be enforced.

Recommended dashboards & alerts for Major incident management (MIM)

Executive dashboard

• Panels:
• Service availability and SLO burn rates.
• Recent major incidents and business impact summary.
• Error budget status and trend.
• Incident frequency and MTTR trend.
• Why: Provides high-level view for leadership to make decisions.

On-call dashboard

• Panels:
• Real-time error rate and latency for critical services.
• Active alerts and incident bridge link.
• Top traces and recent deploys.
• Runbook quick links and rollback controls.
• Why: Focused operational view for responders to act quickly.

Debug dashboard

• Panels:
• Request traces, top error traces, service dependency map.
• Resource metrics (CPU, memory, queue depth).
• Recent config or deploy changes.
• Relevant logs filtered by trace ID.
• Why: Deep diagnostics to find root cause.

Alerting guidance

• What should page vs ticket:
• Page for immediate user-facing outages, data loss, or security incidents.
• Ticket for degraded performance that can be addressed during business hours.
• Burn-rate guidance:
• Use burn-rate thresholds to escalate early. For example, 3x burn rate over a 1-hour window -> notify on-call and product owner.
• Noise reduction tactics:
• Dedupe similar alerts into single incident.
• Group related signals by service or customer impact.
• Suppress alerts during planned maintenance windows.
• Use dynamic thresholds informed by historical baselines.

---

Implementation Guide (Step-by-step)

1) Prerequisites – Defined SLIs and SLOs for critical services. – Instrumentation for metrics, logs, and traces. – Escalation policies and on-call rotation. – Runbooks and playbooks for common failure modes. – Communication channels and incident tooling.

2) Instrumentation plan – Map critical user journeys and instrument SLI points. – Add distributed tracing with correlation IDs. – Implement synthetic checks for critical endpoints. – Ensure logging includes structured fields for tracing.

3) Data collection – Centralize metrics, traces, and logs in observability platform. – Configure retention and cardinality controls. – Ensure independent health signals via synthetic monitors.

4) SLO design – Choose SLI carefully for customer-facing experience. – Set realistic SLOs (e.g., availability 99.95% for critical flows). – Define error budget policies and escalation rules.

5) Dashboards – Create on-call, debug, and executive dashboards. – Ensure runbook links and incident bridge access are present. – Validate dashboards in incident drills.

6) Alerts & routing – Define severity thresholds and routing paths. – Configure dedupe, grouping, and suppression. – Link alerts to incident templates and required roles.

7) Runbooks & automation – Author concise runbooks with pre-conditions and rollbacks. – Automate safe operations like circuit breakers and traffic shift. – Version runbooks and test them regularly.

8) Validation (load/chaos/game days) – Execute game days and chaos experiments. – Run full incident drills with cross-functional participants. – Validate communication and escalation paths.

9) Continuous improvement – Conduct blameless postmortems for each major incident. – Track action item closure and measure remediation effectiveness. – Feed learnings back into SLOs, runbooks, and tests.

Include checklists: Pre-production checklist

• SLIs defined and instrumented.
• Synthetic checks in place for critical paths.
• Rollback procedures documented.
• Playbooks for common failures written and tested.
• On-call rotation and escalation configured.

Production readiness checklist

• Dashboards validated and accessible.
• Alert thresholds tuned and tested.
• Communication bridge templates prepared.
• Stakeholder notification paths defined.
• Automation reviewed and safe.

Incident checklist specific to Major incident management (MIM)

• Confirm impact and scope with data.
• Declare major incident and open bridge.
• Assign incident commander and scribe.
• Execute immediate containment actions.
• Communicate status internally and externally.
• Track timeline and actions; update every 15 minutes.
• After resolution, run postmortem and assign actions.

---

Use Cases of Major incident management (MIM)

Provide 8–12 use cases:

1) Global API outage – Context: API gateway misconfiguration affecting global traffic. – Problem: 50% request failures and SLA breaches. – Why MIM helps: Centralized coordination to apply config rollback and traffic reroute. – What to measure: Availability, error rates, traffic per region. – Typical tools: API gateway, CDN, observability, incident platform.

2) Database primary failure – Context: DB primary crash during peak window. – Problem: Elevated latency, timeouts, transactional rollback risks. – Why MIM helps: Promote replica, reduce writes, and coordinate application changes. – What to measure: Replication lag, query errors, write failure rate. – Typical tools: DB monitoring, replication tools, runbooks.

3) Kubernetes control-plane outage – Context: K8s control plane degraded after bad upgrade. – Problem: Pod scheduling and API timeouts. – Why MIM helps: Evacuate workloads, roll back control-plane, and coordinate tenant teams. – What to measure: API server latency, pod pending counts, node health. – Typical tools: Kubernetes dashboard, cluster monitoring, infra management tools.

4) Third-party auth provider outage – Context: OAuth provider downtime prevents logins. – Problem: Users cannot access the application. – Why MIM helps: Implement fallbacks, temporary token acceptance, and communicate. – What to measure: Auth error rate, login failures, application load. – Typical tools: Synthetic checks, auth logs, feature flags.

5) Payment processing failure – Context: Payment gateway errors causing failed transactions. – Problem: Revenue lost and financial reconciliation issues. – Why MIM helps: Circuit-break payments, retry policies, and customer comms. – What to measure: Failed transactions, authorization latency. – Typical tools: Payment gateway dashboards, logs, monitoring.

6) Security breach (active) – Context: Active exploitation of vulnerability. – Problem: Data exfiltration risk and regulatory obligations. – Why MIM helps: Rapid containment, forensics, and legal coordination. – What to measure: Unusual data transfer, suspicious logins, privilege escalation events. – Typical tools: SIEM, EDR, incident response tooling.

7) CI/CD pipeline causing bad release – Context: Automated deploys roll out faulty release to production. – Problem: Spike in errors post-deploy. – Why MIM helps: Pause pipeline, rollback release, and analyze root cause. – What to measure: Deploy frequency, post-deploy error rate. – Typical tools: CI/CD, deployment tooling, feature flags.

8) Cost-driven throttling impacts – Context: Cloud cost automations throttle resource usage. – Problem: Unexpected scaling limits causing outages. – Why MIM helps: Coordinate finance, infra, and engineering to adjust policies. – What to measure: Throttled requests, budget alerts, scaling events. – Typical tools: Cloud billing alerts, infra automation, dashboards.

---

Scenario Examples (Realistic, End-to-End)

Scenario #1 — Kubernetes control plane regression

Context: A control plane upgrade causes API server latency and pod scheduling failures in a regional cluster.
Goal: Restore cluster API responsiveness and schedule pods safely.
Why Major incident management (MIM) matters here: Multiple teams and stateful workloads impacted; uncoordinated actions risk data loss.
Architecture / workflow: K8s control plane, managed etcd, node pools, statefulsets, monitoring and alerting.
Step-by-step implementation:

• Detect via API latency alert.
• Declare major incident; open bridge and assign IC.
• Check recent control-plane change and rollback plan.
• Promote previous control plane snapshot or roll back managed provider upgrade.
• Temporarily cordon new nodes and angle traffic to healthy clusters.
• Validate pod scheduling and API response.
• Communicate status and run postmortem. What to measure: API server latency, pod pending count, etcd health, replication status.
  Tools to use and why: Kubernetes API metrics, cloud provider control plane tools, tracing for scheduler.
  Common pitfalls: Rushing node reboots without verifying control plane state.
  Validation: Run canary workload scheduling and synthetic API checks.
  Outcome: Cluster restored, controlled upgrade plan instituted.

Scenario #2 — Serverless function cold-start storm

Context: A new traffic pattern triggers many cold starts in serverless functions causing high latency.
Goal: Reduce end-to-end latency and stabilize user experience.
Why MIM matters here: Customer-facing latency surge across many regions demands fast mitigation and provider-level communication.
Architecture / workflow: API gateway -> Lambda-style functions -> downstream DB.
Step-by-step implementation:

• Detect via RUM and function metrics.
• Declare major incident; assign IC and performance owner.
• Pinpoint functions with high cold-starts and throttle incoming traffic.
• Deploy provisioned concurrency or switch to warmed container pool.
• Monitor downstream backpressure and increase capacity if needed. What to measure: Invocation latency, cold-start percentage, error rate.
  Tools to use and why: Cloud function monitoring, RUM, synthetic checks.
  Common pitfalls: Over-provisioning without cost guardrails.
  Validation: Load tests simulating new pattern.
  Outcome: Latency reduced and autoscaling configuration adjusted.

Scenario #3 — Postmortem and remediation playbook

Context: Recurring storage performance incidents affecting batch jobs.
Goal: Identify root cause and implement durable fixes.
Why MIM matters here: Repeated majors reduce throughput and trust; coordinated remediation necessary.
Architecture / workflow: Batch system -> distributed storage -> job scheduler.
Step-by-step implementation:

• Triage incident, gather timeline and metrics.
• Declare major incident and collect artifact snapshots.
• Run RCA workshop with storage and scheduling teams.
• Implement data tiering and backpressure controls.
• Validate with scaled batch runs and monitor. What to measure: Job failure rate, storage latency, throughput.
  Tools to use and why: Logs, traces, storage metrics, postmortem templates.
  Common pitfalls: Jumping to fixes without durable change.
  Validation: Verify with repeated runs over a week.
  Outcome: Remediation implemented and recurrence prevented.

Scenario #4 — Cost/performance trade-off throttle

Context: Automated budget control throttles auto-scale, causing performance degradation during a sale.
Goal: Balance cost policy with customer-facing performance.
Why MIM matters here: Financial automation caused customer impact; requires multidisciplinary response.
Architecture / workflow: Cloud billing automation -> scaling policies -> autoscaler -> services.
Step-by-step implementation:

• Detect via performance dashboards and billing alerts.
• Declare major incident; include finance and infra leads.
• Temporarily relax budget throttle and increase autoscaler limit.
• Recompute budget thresholds based on expected traffic.
• Implement pre-authorization for sales windows. What to measure: Throttled events, response latency, cost delta.
  Tools to use and why: Cloud billing, autoscaler logs, monitoring.
  Common pitfalls: Ignoring business calendar in cost automation.
  Validation: Simulate sale and verify autoscaling behavior.
  Outcome: Policy revised with calendar-aware overrides.

---

Common Mistakes, Anti-patterns, and Troubleshooting

List 15–25 mistakes with: Symptom -> Root cause -> Fix

1. Symptom: No alert triggered for outage -> Root cause: Telemetry blind spot -> Fix: Add synthetic checks and heartbeat metrics.
2. Symptom: Bridge unreachable -> Root cause: Comm platform ACL or outage -> Fix: Maintain secondary comms and test regularly.
3. Symptom: Runbook fails when executed -> Root cause: Stale automation or environment mismatch -> Fix: Test runbooks in staging and version them.
4. Symptom: Too many pages -> Root cause: Low signal-to-noise alerts -> Fix: Tune thresholds and group alerts.
5. Symptom: Long MTTR -> Root cause: Poor role assignment and unclear IC -> Fix: Enforce IC role and runbook discipline.
6. Symptom: Conflicting mitigations by teams -> Root cause: No centralized coordination -> Fix: Single commander model and clear escalation.
7. Symptom: Postmortem not produced -> Root cause: No accountability or templates -> Fix: Automate postmortem creation and assign owners.
8. Symptom: Automation causes more failures -> Root cause: Unsafe runbook automation -> Fix: Add dry-run, canary, and rollback.
9. Symptom: Data corruption after rollback -> Root cause: Incomplete rollback strategy -> Fix: Include DB migration rollback and backups.
10. Symptom: On-call burnout -> Root cause: Overuse of MIM or poorly distributed duty -> Fix: Adjust rotations, add secondary responders, increase automation.
11. Symptom: Stakeholders uninformed -> Root cause: No comms lead or status cadence -> Fix: Designate comms and schedule updates.
12. Symptom: Duplicate incidents -> Root cause: Alert dedupe not configured -> Fix: Implement grouping rules and incident correlation.
13. Symptom: Security evidence lost -> Root cause: No forensic preservation -> Fix: Preserve logs and isolate affected systems before remediation.
14. Symptom: Incorrect SLOs -> Root cause: SLIs measure wrong user experience -> Fix: Re-evaluate SLIs based on user journeys.
15. Symptom: Lack of post-incident action closure -> Root cause: No tracking of remediation -> Fix: Require action item owners and deadlines.
16. Symptom: Observability dashboards slow -> Root cause: High-cardinality queries -> Fix: Pre-aggregate metrics and optimize queries.
17. Symptom: Failed dependency not traced -> Root cause: Missing dependency mapping -> Fix: Maintain updated service maps.
18. Symptom: False positives from synthetic checks -> Root cause: Poorly designed scripts -> Fix: Make synthetics robust and complementary to real-user metrics.
19. Symptom: Pager noise during maintenance -> Root cause: No maintenance windows -> Fix: Schedule maintenance and suppress alerts.
20. Symptom: Legal not involved in breach -> Root cause: No security comms plan -> Fix: Add legal and compliance to playbooks.
21. Symptom: Observability gaps -> Root cause: Missing trace context -> Fix: Add correlation IDs and propagate context.
22. Symptom: Metrics misalignment across teams -> Root cause: No common SLI definitions -> Fix: Create org-level SLI catalog.
23. Symptom: Alerts not actionable -> Root cause: Alerts lack remediation steps -> Fix: Include remediation hints and runbook links in alerts.
24. Symptom: Slow cross-region failover -> Root cause: High DNS TTLs and improper routing -> Fix: Reduce TTLs and prepare traffic shift scripts.
25. Symptom: Incident declared too late -> Root cause: Over-reliance on human reports -> Fix: Automated severity detection thresholds.

Include at least 5 observability pitfalls above (entries 1,16,17,18,21).

---

Best Practices & Operating Model

Ownership and on-call

• Define service ownership clearly; primary and secondary on-call.
• Rotate on-call fairly and include escalation policies.
• Maintain playbooks and assign owners for runbooks.

Runbooks vs playbooks

• Runbooks: execute-to-fix tasks for common issues.
• Playbooks: scenario-driven coordination across teams.
• Keep both concise, version-controlled, and tested.

Safe deployments (canary/rollback)

• Use small canaries and automated health checks before full rollouts.
• Keep immediate rollback paths ready and tested.

Toil reduction and automation

• Automate mundane steps: log collection, access grants, and rollbacks.
• Use ChatOps for reproducible actions and audit trails.

Security basics

• Protect incident tooling with least privilege.
• Preserve evidence and follow legal/compliance playbooks for breaches.
• Rotate keys and secrets safely during incidents.

Weekly/monthly routines

• Weekly: Review alerts that fired, check runbook changes, verify on-call schedule.
• Monthly: Review SLO burn rates and action item progress.
• Quarterly: Run game days, update critical library dependencies and validate playbooks.

What to review in postmortems related to Major incident management (MIM)

• Timeline accuracy and gaps.
• Decision rationale and alternatives considered.
• Action items: ownership, priority, and verification.
• Automation gaps and runbook failures.
• SLO and alerting adjustments.

---

Tooling & Integration Map for Major incident management (MIM) (TABLE REQUIRED)

ID	Category	What it does	Key integrations	Notes
I1	Observability	Collects metrics, logs, traces	Alerts, incident platform, CI/CD	See details below: I1
I2	Incident management	Orchestrates incident lifecycle	Chat, monitoring, status page	Central source of truth
I3	ChatOps	Executes runbooks in chat	CI/CD, infra APIs, bots	Requires secure auth
I4	CI/CD	Deploys changes and rollbacks	Git, observability, incident tools	Enables fast remediation
I5	Status page	External customer updates	Incident platform, monitoring	Public trust builder
I6	Synthetic monitoring	Simulates user journeys	Observability, alerts	Complements RUM
I7	Tracing	Request path debugging	APM, logs, observability	Essential for root cause
I8	Security tooling	SIEM and EDR for breaches	Incident platform, logs	Forensic capability
I9	Runbook registry	Stores runbooks and versions	ChatOps, incident tools	Encourage testing
I10	Cost monitoring	Tracks cloud spend and budgets	Cloud billing, alarms	Tied to autoscaling policies

Row Details (only if needed)

• I1: Observability should support high-cardinality labels and controlled retention; ensure synthetic checks are integrated.

---

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

What is the difference between an incident and a major incident?

A major incident has high severity and business impact requiring formal MIM activation and cross-team coordination.

Who should be the incident commander?

Someone trained for the role, often a senior engineer or SRE, with authority to make rapid decisions and coordinate stakeholders.

How do you decide severity levels?

Severity should map to business impact metrics like revenue loss, user impact percentage, or SLA breach risk.

How long should a major incident bridge stay open?

Until service is validated stable and mitigations are in place; typically closed once sustained recovery is observed for agreed period.

Should runbooks be automated?

Yes where safe; automation reduces toil but must include safeguards like dry-runs and manual veto.

How does MIM relate to SLAs?

MIM minimizes SLA breaches by enabling rapid recovery; SLOs and error budgets inform when to escalate.

How do you handle customer communication during a major incident?

Assign a comms lead and use clear, non-technical updates at regular intervals and a status page.

How often should you practice incident response?

At least quarterly game days; critical teams may practice monthly.

What metrics indicate MIM effectiveness?

MTTD, MTTA, MTTR, postmortem completion rate, and action closure rate.

How can AI help in MIM?

AI assists with alert grouping, automated triage, and suggested remediation but should not replace human decisions.

How do you prevent alert fatigue?

Tune alerts, apply grouping/dedupe, and set actionable thresholds tied to customer impact.

Who is responsible for postmortem actions?

Assigned owners with deadlines; action items must be tracked and verified.

Are major incidents always public?

Not always; disclosure depends on customer impact, compliance, and legal requirements.

How to manage cross-region failover decisions?

Predefine failover playbooks and test them in drills; consider data consistency impacts.

What are common pitfalls in MIM tooling?

Over-automation without safety, inconsistent instrumentation, and poorly integrated communication channels.

How to measure business impact during an incident?

Use transaction counts, revenue telemetry, and customer facing KPIs mapped to incident timeline.

When should executives be notified?

When incident affects critical SLAs, legal/regulatory thresholds, or major revenue impact — defined in escalation policy.

How to balance cost and reliability in MIM?

Define acceptable SLOs for business-critical paths and use cost-aware scaling with exceptions for high-impact events.

---

Conclusion

Major incident management is a structured blend of people, process, and technology that enables organizations to detect, coordinate, and remediate high-severity outages with minimal business impact. It ties closely to SRE practices, observability, and automation while requiring clear ownership and practiced procedures.

Next 7 days plan

• Day 1: Inventory critical services and document owners.
• Day 2: Define or validate SLIs/SLOs for top 3 services.
• Day 3: Audit runbooks and mark those untested or stale.
• Day 4: Configure one emergency synthetic check and incident bridge.
• Day 5: Run a short tabletop exercise with on-call and comms leads.

---

Appendix — Major incident management (MIM) Keyword Cluster (SEO)

Primary keywords

• major incident management
• MIM
• incident commander
• incident management process
• major incident response
• incident management best practices

Secondary keywords

• SRE incident response
• incident runbook
• incident triage
• postmortem process
• incident lifecycle
• incident severity levels
• incident communication

Long-tail questions

• how to manage a major incident in production
• what is a major incident in ITIL vs SRE
• how to measure incident response effectiveness
• how to build an incident commander role
• how to run a major incident postmortem
• how to automate runbooks safely
• how to design incident escalation policies

Related terminology

• mean time to detect
• mean time to recover
• SLIs and SLOs for incidents
• error budget burn rate
• incident bridge best practices
• synthetic monitoring for MIM
• chaos engineering for incident readiness
• incident playbook templates
• communicatons during outage
• incident management tooling
• service ownership and on-call
• incident automation and ChatOps
• forensic readiness for breaches
• post-incident action closure
• outages and business impact
• incident drill and game day
• multi-region failover playbook
• traffic shifting and canaries
• rollback strategy for incidents
• incident role definitions
• blameless postmortem templates
• incident metrics dashboard
• alert dedupe grouping
• runbook version control
• incident response KPIs
• major outage communication cadence
• incident commander checklist
• incident scribe best practices
• incident response playbooks for cloud
• observability gaps and incident response
• incident recovery validation steps
• incident declaration criteria
• incident response checklist for execs
• incident lessons learned repository
• incident workflow orchestration
• incident automation safeguards
• incident triage decision tree
• incident response training plan
• incident response for serverless
• incident response for Kubernetes
• incident response for databases
• incident management for SaaS outages
• incident postmortem action verification
• incident remediation tracking tools
• incident impact quantification methods
• incident readiness assessment